Qian Sun vs Edward Winter Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 09 Aug at 11:09 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
Q. Sun vs E. Winter

CHN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Sun 1 - 0 Winter
They have played 2 sets in total, with Qian Sun winning 2 and Edward Winter winning 0. The last match between Qian Sun and Edward Winter was at the M15 Wuning, 09-08-2025, Round: SF, Surface: Hard, with Qian Sun getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sun | 1 |
| Winter | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(SF) M15 Wuning(08-09-25)
Q. Sun vs E. Winter H2H Profile
Q. Sun vs E. Winter Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Over the past six months, Sun has secured 40.55% of points on their second serve, whereas Winter has achieved a slightly higher rate at 43.97%. This statistic is closely linked to predicting match outcomes. Could this give Winter an advantage? With a better performance in this aspect, it certainly might.
- Return Game Stats: Recently, Sun has won 45.99% of points on their opponents' second serves, compared to Winter’s 46.18%. The first serve return points are slightly in favor of Sun at 29.91%, while Winter is at 29.05%. These numbers are indicative of which player might perform better in return games. Is Sun marginally better equipped on first serve returns? The numbers suggest so.
- Under Pressure Analysis: Sun has saved 53.37% of break points in recent forms, while Winter boasts a higher save rate at 58.2%. This insight is particularly valuable for those considering in-game bets. Does Winter have the upper hand when saving break points? The data supports this notion.
- Performance Overview: In the past year, Sun has won 58% of their matches, and Winter stands slightly ahead with 59.68%. How significant is this overall winning percentage? It suggests a closely matched competition.
- Best Surface: Sun performs best on Hard courts with a career win percentage of 55%, whereas Winter excels on Indoor hard courts with a win rate of 60%. What does this mean for their upcoming match? Should the surface be a deciding factor, Winter might hold an edge.
- Player Level: Sun has primarily competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events and won 59.18% of those matches, while Winter has won 63.64% in the same tournament tier. Does Winter show a higher consistency at this level? Indeed, the stats imply so.
- Opponent Quality: Sun’s opponents have had an average rank of 326.24, compared to Winter’s tougher competition with an average rank of 156.85. How does this impact their relative strengths? Playing against stronger opponents could indicate Winter is better acclimated to higher-caliber matches.
- Deciding Sets Performance: Should the match progress to a deciding set, Sun has a 38% win rate, while Winter has a 50% success rate. Who might have the edge if the match goes the distance? Winter appears to perform better under such circumstances.
- Break Point Conversion: Sun has a 33.33% success rate in converting break points recently, while Winter converts at 30.23%. Could this indicate a slight tactical advantage for Sun during critical points? Potentially, yes.
Editorial Prediction (August 9, 2025, UTC):
As we look into their recent performances and key statistical breakdowns, Sun and Winter appear closely matched in several areas. Sun's strengths illustrate effective break point conversion and a slight edge in first-serve return capabilities, which could prove pivotal during critical game points.
However, Winter presents a stronger overall game under pressure, which is reflected in their higher success rate in saving break points and winning deciding sets. Additionally, Winter has consistently faced tougher opponents, suggesting a higher level of match preparedness.
Factoring in performances on favored surfaces and recent tournament levels, Winter's slightly superior statistics across several domains hint at a competitive edge. Therefore, based on these insights, Winter seems more likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming match.
Qian Sun vs Edward Winter Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Q. Sun vs E. Winter H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:28:37 | Average Match Time | 1:28:37 |
| 50% (22/44) | 1st Serve % | 62% (32/52) |
| 91% (20/22) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (22/32) |
| 59% (13/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (7/20) |
| 33% (3/9) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/2) |
| 44% (23/52) | Return Points Win % | 25% (11/44) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
Q. Sun Recent Matches Played
E. Winter Recent Matches Played

Q. Sun vs E. Winter Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50.00% (82/82) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.05% (101/73) |
| 51.35% (190/180) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.84% (225/164) |
| 50.92% (1764/1700) | Games Win/Loss | 54.15% (1972/1670) |
| 53.52% (76/66) | Hard Win/Loss | 59.21% (90/62) |
| 0.00% (0/9) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.14% (4/3) |
| 46.15% (6/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 37.50% (3/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 57.14% (4/3) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
| 441 | Aces Total | 312 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 381 | Total Double Faults | 478 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:38:40 |
| 337.9 | Average Opponent Rank | 408.48 |
| 59% (3321/5626) | 1st Serve % | 65% (7004/10746) |
| 68% (2259/3321) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (4730/7004) |
| 44% (1008/2305) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (1894/3742) |
| 42% (218/519) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (503/1213) |
| 39% (2159/5605) | Return Points Win % | 41% (4472/10779) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 33.33% (2/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 25.00% (2/6) | Challenger W/L | 51.16% (22/21) |
| 51.28% (80/76) | Futures W/L | 63.11% (77/45) |
| 50% (80/160) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (100/173) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 48% (16/33) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (28/52) |
| 38% (16/42) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (17/40) |
| 84% (86/72) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (105/89) |
| 16% (86/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (105/16) |
| 13% (78/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (69/12) |